logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.11.22 2013고정1760
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is engaged in the business of driving 125cc Scand Topland.

On May 21, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 21:00, and made the three-lane way from the 88 Olympic Park in Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu, Seoul to turn to the left at an insular speed, depending on three-lanes from the direction of Songpa-gu Office to the ASEAN Hospital.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others, depending on the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and has the duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reporting well the traffic conditions before and after the traffic and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so and neglected to stop in the front and rear door of the damaged vehicle, and neglected to balke car driven by the victim B (38 years old, South) who was driving in the front and rear door, and had balked. However, the Defendant contacted the front and rear door part of the damaged vehicle due to the left hand part, etc.

As a result, the Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle by occupational negligence in the amount of KRW 990,00,00.

2. The Defendant operated approximately 2 km section from Songpa-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul to the front of the 88 peace in Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu to the front of the 88 peaceful movement, and operated 125 cc cki in Grandland, owned by himself, who was not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident by Defendant B and B;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of written estimates and the Acts and subordinate statutes governing affected vehicles;

1. Motor vehicles which are not mandatory insurance under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 151 of the Act on the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation and Article 46 (2) 2 and Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, in relation to criminal facts, and the choice of punishment;

arrow