A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On April 27, 2017, the Defendant 00:39 around 00:39, when she puts “D” stairs in C in C, to E, and took a bath, the Defendant satisfing the sat.

“A police officer, who is a police officer belonging to the F District Unit of the Magpo Police Station, who received a report on the content 112 and dispatched to the said place, intends to restrain the Defendant, and “G,” refers to “A person who is a police officer belonging to the F District Unit of the Mapo Police Station, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 times with G’s floor, etc. . . . . . . . . Mada for whom G continued to go to E;

Governance 2, 201, "........", the floor of the hand was 3 times back to the back of G, and the neck of G was tightly used.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence include the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and made efforts to recover damage, deposited some of the money, and the degree of assault in the above crime cannot be exceeded and the degree of assault cannot be exceeded. The dismissed part of the indictment (Assault)

1. The summary of the facts charged in this part of the charges is as follows: (a) the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol in the stairs of “D” singing practice hall located in “D” on April 27, 2017, and (b) the Defendant is the owner of the said singing practice hall (62 h) from the victim E (62 h) who is the owner of the said singing practice hall.

“Along with the words “,” the victim’s breath and breath with her hand, assaulted the victim’s breath.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent. Since the victim withdraws his intention of punishment after the indictment of this case, it is subject to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.