beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 7,963,224 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from June 1, 2016 to October 25, 2017.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On August 23, 2013, the Plaintiff, a company running the photographing business, etc., set the lease deposit amount of KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 22,50,000 (excluding value-added tax), from August 23, 2013 to November 30, 2015, the lease term of KRW 217.91 square meters, 212.08 square meters, 210.68 square meters, 210 square meters, 3rd floors, 194.25 square meters (hereinafter “the leased object of this case”) from the Defendant, on the leased object of this case.
B. At the time of the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff agreed to restore the real estate to its original state and return it to the Defendant, and thereafter, the instant lease agreement was extended by May 31, 2016 upon the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.
C. The instant lease agreement was terminated upon the expiration of the period on May 31, 2016, and the Plaintiff delivered the leased object to the Defendant on May 31, 2016, but the Defendant returned KRW 230 million out of the deposit KRW 330 million to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is necessary to settle the cost of restoration, etc.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 5, Eul evidence No. 5 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts of the determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant, barring any special circumstance, has the obligation to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 97,720,00 ( KRW 330 million - KRW 230,000 - KRW 24,750,000 for May 2016, 200, KRW 27,280,000 for the recovery of floor and ceiling (27,280,000 for the restoration of floor and ceiling, and KRW 11,250,00 for the restoration of the original state (15 days), excluding the remainder of KRW 11,250,00 for the period (15 days), excluding the remainder of KRW 97,720,00 for the restoration of the original state ( KRW 97,000 - KRW 24,750,000 - KRW 27,200,125,00) and delay damages for delay from the following day.
3. The defendant's assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiff asserted that this case.