logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.05.18 2016나63970
손해배상(자)
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 9,083,33.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. The height of the judgment of the court of first instance shall consist of the parallel 7th to 9th parallel 14th parallel of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows.

Article 25(2) of the Road Traffic Act provides that the driver of a vehicle who intends to make a left turn to the left at the intersection without checking the situation of the vehicle driven by the deceased at the center of the road (Article 25(2) of the Road Traffic Act). The deceased’s vehicle entered the intersection while attempting to make a left turn to the left at the intersection. If the driver’s right turn to the left is observed by observing the central line, the degree of the collision and shock with the projected vehicles may be mitigated. ② The driver of a vehicle who intends to make a left turn to the left at the intersection where the traffic is not controlled by the traffic, is obliged to yield the right of way to the vehicle directly or right-hand (Article 26(4) of the Road Traffic Act). The driver of the vehicle without checking the situation of the vehicle driven by the deceased, is obliged to temporarily stop the traffic at the intersection of the Plaintiff at the speed of the driver’s right-hand vehicle (Article 13(1) of the Road Traffic Act).

arrow