The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of both the violation of the Child Reinstatement Act (sexual harassment, etc. against a child) and the violation of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse ( possession of obscene materials) among the modified facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the violation of the law of logic and experience, thereby exceeding the bounds of free conviction, or by exceeding the bounds of the law of logic and experience (sexual harassment, etc. against a child), and the violation of the Act on the Protection of Children against Sexual Abuse ( possession of obscene materials).

In addition, examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, there are special circumstances that the court below should not disclose personal information to the defendant for reasons as stated in its reasoning.

It is difficult to see

It is reasonable to order the disclosure of information about the defendant for a period of seven years, and there is no violation of law as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.