1. The Plaintiff (Appointed)’s lawsuit against Defendant G and Defendant Appointed H shall be dismissed.

2...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The status of the Plaintiff’s designated parties, including the Plaintiff, and the form of operation of the instant fraternity, are those who run several accounts from April 1, 2008 to January 20, 2010 in the boundary of the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Telecommunication building 1204.

The designated parties except the Plaintiff (Withdrawals), A, C, and the Plaintiff (Appointeds) are members of the community of several old accounts operated by the said S, and the Plaintiff (Appointeds) is a person who received the claim for the return of the deposit amount from the above A on December 9, 201, and from the above A on December 9, 201, the Plaintiff (Appointeds) is a person who acquired the claim for the return of the deposit amount from the Defendant’s Appointeds to the Defendant.

B. Around June 2008, Defendant Appointor I and S asked that “the name of the head of the Tong who borrowed the money and borrowed the money from the members of the fraternity,” the Defendant Appointor I borrowed the money in order to operate the fraternity and borrowed the money from the members of the fraternity.”

Accordingly, in order to secure the lease deposit amount of KRW 180,00,000 among the lease deposit amount of KRW 20,000, the Defendant Selection leased the above bank under his own name (Evidence A 25), and issued to S each passbook, cash card, and password of the bank account in his own name (Account Number U), the new bank account (Account Number V), and the national bank account (Account Number V).

S operated the said fraternity in the name of I, and received the deposit money into the said deposit account in the name of I.

C. Since the process of criminal complaint against S and Defendant Selection and the process of criminal complaint against S and the process of criminal complaint against S and the process of criminal complaint and the process of the above guidance operated by S around January 20, 2010, the members filed a criminal complaint against S and Defendant I.

Accordingly, S was prosecuted for fraud, etc. that "the person who acquired money from the members of the fraternity while operating the fraternity normally while maintaining the fraternity normally, and acquired money from the members of the fraternity," and became final and conclusive after being sentenced to one year and six months.

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2010Da4971 decided May 25, 201, and Seoul Central District Court Decision 31 October 201.