The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal: F, the accomplice of the defendant, is separately indicted, and with respect to the transfer of the business right of the construction and sale of apartment-type factories on the land outside Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and outside 26 lots of land (hereinafter “instant sale business”), F, the accomplice of the defendant, was convicted of the fact that each of the documents, such as an agreement on the sale of real estate, in the attached list of crimes (hereinafter “agreement on the sale of real estate of this case”), as indicated in the judgment of the court below, has been forged and exercised, and the defendant conspired with the defendant and acquired 1.5 billion won from J under the pretext of the transfer proceeds of the instant sale business of this case, and F, upon being investigated by the prosecutor on December 20, 2011, presented documents to the defendant and told the defendant all of the facts.

No. 209. 3 October 2009, the fact that the BF's sale of land was a forged document was made to another person, such as BF, and the BF's sale of land was discovered.

Therefore, I told the defendant who was friendly at the time of this fact.

When there is money to the lower, the Defendant is able to ask whether or not he may re-work on the land.

money at the time of the statement; and

this section.

Therefore, I present forged documents to the defendant.

“At the time of entering into the contract with the Defendant, the Defendant was also aware of the forgery of the agreement on land purchase and sale even when he/she was investigated by the prosecution on March 27, 2014 in the instant case.

Since the certificate of seal impression from the props is true, it is forged that the letter of agreement on the trade of land for the props has been forged on the face of only money to the props.

Even if the project can continue,

In addition, I concluded the transfer contract with the author.

As to “the Defendant was aware that the agreement, etc. on the instant real estate transaction was forged around October 2009,” such as making a statement as “.”