logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2019.01.16 2018가단75327
약정금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with D Religious Organization D (hereinafter “D”) on September 2013, 2013, under which the Plaintiff organized a business organization and recruited believers, and provided products or services (hereinafter “new products”) from D companies, such as plaques, raw materials, Guideins, tins, tins, stonestones, and ceilings, to exclusively obtain the right to operate and sell the products or services (hereinafter “new products”), but to divide profits from attracting new products.

B. On September 16, 2013, the Plaintiff introduced the Defendant from E and issued to the Defendant a certificate of borrowing KRW 170 million with the main content of interest KRW 30 million and the due date for repayment on December 30, 2014, to raise funds for the said business.

[Reasons for Recognition] 1 and 6 Evidence Nos. 1 and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion asserts that the Plaintiff sold D’s new D’s goods to eight teachers entrusted with the management and operation by the Defendant, and the Defendant agreed to pay 32% of the sales proceeds to the Plaintiff, but did not receive KRW 57,122,000 out of the agreed money from the Defendant.

B. As to whether there was an agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant as alleged in the Plaintiff, each statement in the Health Team and evidence Nos. 5 through 8 (including each number) that correspond thereto is difficult to believe in light of the respective statements in the evidence Nos. 1 and 6, each statement in the evidence Nos. 1 and 4 is insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

The plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.

arrow