The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

When seized gallon, one (No. 1) shall be forfeited.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (six months of imprisonment) is too unfluent and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant is the first offender, all of the criminal acts are dead and reflected, and the specific contents of the crimes of Bosing are finally and conclusively recognized.

It does not seem that there are many benefits that the defendant suffered, and it seems that there are no benefits that the defendant suffered is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the instant crime was committed so-called “Sishing,” in a systematic and systematic manner, by which the victims receive money from the victims, and the personal and social harm is very serious, and thus, it is necessary to strictly punish the persons who participated in the instant crime. The Defendant was in charge of withdrawing and delivering the amount of damage caused by the instant criminal act. The Defendant was in charge of taking the part in the Defendant’s participation in the instant criminal act in light of the characteristics of the Bosishing crime.

It is difficult to see that the defendant actively participated in each of the crimes of this case while moving various fields, such as source of water, strike, Ansan, and harmony, etc., seven times during the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the middle of the year. The

Considering the above circumstances and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence sentenced by the court below is deemed unfair because it is unfunched.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is with merit, and the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is again decided as follows after pleading.

【Inasmuch as the facts constituting a crime and the summary of evidence recognized by the court are as stated in the corresponding column of the judgment below, all of them are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1..