The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., both types of punishment) of the lower court is too unreasonable when considering the following: (a) the Defendant intends to borrow a loan within the limits of the deposit amount; and (b) contingently leads to the instant crime; and (c) new workplace is economically difficult to save a new workplace.

2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed a mistake in the trial at the time of the trial; (b) even though the lessor, due to the instant crime, suffered damage on behalf of the lessor, the Defendant did not cause any particular damage to D; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and all other circumstances constituting the sentencing conditions as indicated in the instant records and arguments, including the circumstances after the crime, etc., it is unreasonable for the lower court’s punishment to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.