1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as the Plaintiff KRW 56,253,193 and as a result, from April 30, 2013 to May 3, 2015.

1. The plaintiff's judgment on the plaintiff's claim is asserted as the cause of the claim of this case as shown in the separate sheet, and it can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the whole pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including additional number).

2. Defendant B’s assertion that Defendant B asserted that the Plaintiff had no choice but to induce Defendant D, his mother, thereby preparing a notarized performance letter (No. 3). Thus, Defendant B’s assertion is without merit, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the above Defendant’s assertion is rejected as it is without merit.

3. If so, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 56,253,193 ( = lease deposit KRW 70,00,000 - Dividend KRW 13,746,807) and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act from March 29, 2013, the date of distribution of the real estate rental auction case E, which was the date of distribution, to the Plaintiff, from March 29, 2013 to May 3, 2015, the duplicate of the instant complaint from April 30, 2013, which was sought by the Plaintiff, to the Plaintiff, until May 3, 2015, and from the next day to the date of full payment. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case is reasonable, and is so decided as per Disposition with the assent of all participating Justices.