1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of disposition;

A. On March 23, 2015, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Austria (hereinafter referred to as “Austria”), entered the Republic of Korea as a sojourn status of ordinary commercial use (30 days during the stay period) and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on April 9, 2015.

B. On December 23, 2015, the Defendant issued a notification of refugee status refusal (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that is a requirement for refugee status under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice. However, on May 31, 2016, the application was dismissed, and the notice of dismissal was served on the Plaintiff on June 16, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 3, Gap's 5, Eul's 1, and the purport of whole pleading

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's act of attack of Bobi, a Islamic armed organization, died of an employee working at the plaintiff's store, the products were damaged by fire in the plaintiff's store, and the parents of the deceased employee threatened the plaintiff on the ground of his own consciousness death, and the threatened transaction partner who supplied the goods had a threat to the plaintiff, such as demanding the payment of credit, and thus, the plaintiff's act of escape from Gungia was threatened. Therefore, there is sufficient concern that the return of goods to the country of origin would result in imminent fear, and the disposition of this case which did not recognize it on a different premise is unlawful.

(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

C. In light of the following circumstances, comprehensively considering the overall purport of evidence No. 4 and No. 2-1 and No. 2, evidence Nos. 4 and 2 and the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff may also take into account all the evidence and arguments submitted by the Plaintiff.