logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.10 2016가단43528
대여금등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A Co., Ltd. shall start with December 5, 2006 for KRW 221,795,881 and for KRW 174,96,519 among them.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant A, B, C, and D

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(b) Judgment by public notice (Article 208(3)3) of the Civil Procedure Act (Article 208(2) of the Civil Procedure Act) by Defendant B, C, and D (Article 208(3)2, and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. According to the evidence No. 1 of the judgment as to the claim against Defendant E, the facts as stated in attached Form No. 1 can be acknowledged.

On the other hand, according to the purport of the entire pleadings, the fact that the F died on September 2, 2015 and his wife G and his children were the inheritor, and G and H were the inheritor, and on January 22, 2016, G and H received an adjudication on the acceptance of renunciation of inheritance (Scheon District Court Branch Branch 2015Mo220) on February 18, 2016, and the Defendant received an adjudication on the acceptance of succession acceptance (Scheon District Court Branch 2015Mo221) on February 18, 2016.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to perform the obligations of the net F to the plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the net F.

3. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is justified.

arrow