logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.06.30 2016고단470
컴퓨터등사용사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Seized evidence shall be confiscated from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud, etc. in the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on July 21, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 29, 2015, and is currently

1. Fraud;

A. On August 25, 2015, the Internet entrance fraud (2016 Madan829) (1) knew that the Defendant would be able to receive cash KRW 2.70,000,000 from the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F Manymion 102, and that the Defendant would be able to receive cash 2,70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000).

However, in fact, the Defendant was admitted to the Internet for the purpose of receiving cash provided as personal goods and did not have the intention to pay the fee normally. Therefore, there was no intention to pay the fee, and there was no ability to pay the fee due to excess of the liability, such as receiving approximately KRW 24 million loans from the lending company, as well as receiving the loan from the lending company.

Around August 28, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 270,000 won from the victim to the SC bank account under the name of the Defendant from the victim and acquired it by defrauded.

(2) On September 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the said victim by the foregoing method; (b) received money from the victim to the SC bank account in the name of the Defendant on September 25, 2015; and (c) obtained money from the victim.

B. The defraudation of loans (2016 high group 609) stated to the effect that, on October 13, 2015, the Defendant “on the basis of a monthly wage of KRW 1.5 million in the workplace, the Defendant would at once repay the principal and interest of KRW 4 million in the face of lending KRW 4 million.”

However, the defendant not only did not receive monthly pay at the time, but also did not receive approximately KRW 24 million loans from other loan companies.

arrow