The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Where there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared to the judgment of the court below, and the sentencing of the court below is not beyond the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Circumstances alleged by the Defendant as an element of sentencing in this Court are already revealed in the process of pleadings by the lower court, or the lower court appears to have sufficiently taken into account in determining the Defendant’s punishment. There is no particular change in circumstances in the sentencing guidelines with the matters subject to the conditions of sentencing after the lower judgment was sentenced.

Considering the circumstances indicated by the lower court on the grounds of sentencing, comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, conditions of sentencing as indicated in the instant arguments and records, and the scope of recommended sentences based on the sentencing guidelines, such as the circumstances after the crime was committed, the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable as it takes place within the reasonable scope of discretion, even in view of the circumstances that the Defendant was in the grounds of appeal.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because the defendant's appeal is without merit.