Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of four years and six months and a fine of one hundred million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

around August 1989, the Defendant served as a police officer and served as a senior police officer at the 101 Security Team of the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency, who mainly performs the duties of Cheongdae, etc., and served as a slope belonging to the Police University from November 1, 1996. From February 2005 to February 201, the Defendant served as a police officer in the Seoul exists in the office of the public prosecutor and inspector of the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency.

1. On December 23, 2009, the Defendant issued a warrant of arrest to the Gangnam Police Station, the Seocho Police Station, and the Gwangju Police Station, which was introduced through F, and was arrested by the Defendant. Upon request from police officers in charge of the investigation of the instant case, the Defendant: (a) the police officer in charge of the Seoul Gangnam Police Station requested that H not be detained; (b) the police officer in charge of the Seoul Gangnam Police Station, along with the Defendant, was on board the Defendant; (c) the police officer in charge of the Seoul Seocho Police Station known that the Defendant was on board the ship that had worked at the 101 Security Team; and (d) the police officer in charge of the Seoul Western Police Station, along with the Defendant, was able to receive money and valuables from G under the pretext of arranging the police officer in charge not to be detained.

On December 24, 2009, the Defendant received KRW 50 million from the second floor of the parking lot near the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Southern Police Station located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 998, under the pretext that police officers in charge of investigating the case of H are not detained.

As a result, the Defendant received 50 million won from a police officer to arrange matters belonging to the duties of another police officer by taking advantage of his status.

2. The Defendant, as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, intended to deliver part of money and valuables to the police officer in charge of the investigation of the instant case against H, but failed to deliver it to G, and returned part of the money and valuables to G. On the other hand, H was released on January 30, 2010 and returned to G.