The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. It is also recognized that the defendant has a depth of his crime, and that the vehicle driven by the defendant is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, as well as that the victim and the court below agreed with the victim in order to punish the defendant.

However, in full view of the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment and other conditions of sentencing, it cannot be said that the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of execution for a period of four months; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the suspension of execution as sentenced to two years of imprisonment for the same criminal act; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character, and behavior, environment and other conditions of sentencing, it cannot be said that the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.