A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 8, 2015, at around 240, the Defendant discovered that the Defendant was mixed with the Victim E (V) at the 7th floor of the department store store store “D” store located in Songpa-gu Seoul Olympic Games, where the Defendant was in office as a manager, and the Victim E (V) was in office at the 7th floor of the department store store, and the victim was able to drink together with the inside, and the victim was able to have the right side inside of the victim’s hand, turn back the body of the victim back to the body, cut back the victim’s body, and move back to the store computer, and then the victim was able to walk the Defendant’s arms toward the chest of the victim.

At around 13:00 on the same day, the victim continued to find a new product in the store warehouse of the above store 13:00, after drinking the victim's chest, the victim's chest was stored one time, and later, the victim's arms were stored in the victim's arms, and the chest was stored several times in the victim's arms, and at around 16:00 on the same day, the victim was able to cut off with the victim within the elevator for cargo of the above department store.

At around 20:30 on the same day, the victim called that he will leave the above store to the house of the defendant, and then the victim was placed in the car by the Fransh owned by the defendant, and the victim's bucks which had been exposed to the death of the victim due to shortness in the above car were used and rhumbs for the victim's bucks which had been revealed, and the victim's hand carried the area twice.

In this way, the Defendant forced the victim to commit an indecent act four times in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. The victim of the H conversation has made a relatively consistent and detailed statement from the investigative agency to the instant court, and the victim has made a false statement in the motive or above statement.