A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 13, 2017, at around 22:30, the Defendant: (a) prevented the Defendant from entering the said convenience store in front of the “C convenience store” located in Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu; and (b) prevented the Defendant, a policeman belonging to the D District Unit of the Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu, Down-gu, Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu, who was dispatched after receiving a report from 112 on the Jeju-si, from the Jeju-si, from the Jeju-si, the Defendant 1:

As a result, the defendant has prevented police officers from performing their legitimate duties in relation to 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and F (list 4, 5);

1. List of the processing of reported cases (List 2), recording records (List 10);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (List 7);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 136 (1) of the said Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (a confession, reflector, contingent crimes in the state of main operation, or criminal records of the same kind or of a suspended execution of execution of execution of execution of execution of execution of sentence, and it appears that he/she received a letter of apology after finding the above police officers);