beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 10, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution on April 18, 2015 at the Suwon District Court’s Pyeongtaek site for the violation of the Road Traffic Act. The above judgment became final and conclusive on April 18, 2015.
On April 3, 2015, at around 15:30, the Defendant driven B rocketing car without obtaining a driver’s license from approximately 500 meters in front of the Cloulopian Haak-dong to the road before the maintenance of the high speed motor vehicle.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report on the situation of operation without a license, and the register of driver’s licenses;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Search of Konet case bound in trial records, and application of a copy of judgment statutes;
1. Although the Defendant was punished by a fine on June 3, 2014 due to drunk driving, etc., even though he/she had been sentenced to a punishment on the relevant criminal facts, Articles 152 subparag. 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act regarding the applicable criminal facts, and the reason for sentencing the sentence of imprisonment option, etc., he/she again was punished by a fine on December 8, 2014, which is the last month of the 2014, and again was punished by a fine on December 8, 2014, and was charged again on March 12, 2015, which is only one week thereafter, and was prosecuted on March 15, 2015, the Defendant was well informed of the sentence in preparation for the sentence. However, even though he/she was trying to stop the instant criminal acts of the same kind, it cannot be found that the Defendant had been sentenced to a punishment for a long time since he/she had committed a crime of this case on April 3, 2015.
Pronouncement of sentence is inevitable.
However, the crime of the judgment constitutes a latter concurrent crime, and there is no accident caused thereby, and the sentence shall be determined as per the order in consideration of the fact that the crime was committed in a net order, and the crime was committed in good faith.