A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 22, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driving a BNp car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.083% from the 3km section of blood alcohol to the front road of the second apartment of about 3km, which is located in the Taeju-dong in the Taeju-dong in the Taeju-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, up to the same 304 square meters.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a passenger car as set forth in paragraph 1 of this Article.

On November 22, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car with a alcohol content of 0.083% 0.083% of alcohol during blood transfusions, and continued two-lanes of the two-lanes in front of the friendly second apartment in front of the friendly apartment, which is located in the 304-ro of the original city at the front city at the front city at the front city at the front city along the three-lanes of the solar distance.

At this point, the speed of restriction is 50 km per hour, and the intersection and crosswalk are installed on the front side, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by complying with the speed limit and driving on the front side.

Nevertheless, under the foregoing circumstances, the Defendant, while driving a motor vehicle, was negligent in driving the motor vehicle at a speed exceeding 44 km per hour, caused the part of the bridge of the victim C (48 tax) who cross the crosswalk at the right-hand side of the crosswalk to the right-hand side of the road.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, i.e., the opening of a frame for the right-hand decline, which requires approximately 14 weeks of treatment.

3. On June 15, 2017, the Defendant, at around 13:33, driven a vehicle as set forth in paragraph 1 without obtaining a driver’s license from a section of about 100 meters in a distance from the day before the collection of the mutual influences located on the front side of the front city in the front city of the front city to the day on which the door-to-door distance located on the interest of the front city.

Summary of Evidence

1..