Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this judgment is publicly announced.

1. The summary of the facts charged [2014 Highest 2054, 2015 Highest 91] Defendant A is a person who operated a restaurant in the name of “E” in the name of “E” in Pakistan-si, and Defendant B is a person who operated a secondhand shop in the name of “G” in the name of “G” in the Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Busan-si. The Defendants are married and married.

1. Fraud against victim H;

A. The Defendants conspired with the victim's residence on July 30, 200, and found the victim's residence. The defendant Gap lent 15 million won to the victim for the purchase of high water at the construction site of LGG jus and borrowed 15 million won under the name of the bid bond. The defendant Eul also received 13 million won from the victim who borrowed her high water from her seat and received the remainder of 13 million won from her seat. However, the defendant Gap was under the circumstance of using her restaurant as a cafeteria because she was difficult to operate her restaurant at the time. The defendant Eul was also disqualified from her business failure in 2008, and the defendant Eul was also listed in her business credit in her business failure, and the defendant Eul was not aware of the defendant's economic intent or her ability to purchase her money from 100,000 won in collusion with the victim and did not receive her money from 15,000,000 won.

However, in fact, the Defendants are able to receive money from the victims.