The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the resident of B apartment complex, and the victim C is the head of the above B apartment management office.

On March 12, 2015, the Defendant attended a meeting of occupants' representatives held at the Daegu Dong-gu apartment management office on March 2, 2015, Daegu Dong-gu B apartment management office to observe 30 persons, such as the representative, etc., the Defendant “I do not have any question.”

The two divided courses are going in the past, and they are frightening to this.

However, at that time, her place of origin

20,000,000

If the self-management is entrusted, it is given out that the back money was not erroneous.

If so, it would be said that the entrusted management fee was received from the director of the A-A-A-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-K

However, even during the low-class C, C Grade, and C Grade F, respectively.

Many minutes of Fyone-day Fyetetet us to us.

It is why we can see why we can do.

Does the money flow into a voice, and the money go into a match. Does it go to us.

If any, there is no money to be educated in the complaint.

I have the honor to send a bill of waste.

I, this voice can be managed by us

In a large sense, “the victim was openly insultingd.”

2. The grounds for dismissing the public prosecution are the crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the same Act. The main text of Article 230(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a complaint shall not be filed after the lapse of six months from the date on which the victim becomes aware of the crime subject to victim's complaint. Here, "the date on which the victim becomes aware of the offender" refers to the date on which the offender becomes aware of the crime after the completion of the crime.

According to the records, on March 12, 2015, the victim may recognize the fact that the defendant submitted to the police station on December 2, 2015, a letter of complaint containing the statement that he/she had taken the same words as the facts charged, among the meetings of occupants representative around March 12, 2015. The victim is the victim around March 12, 2015, the date and time of the crime.