logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.06.15 2015나52301
추심의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the second instance's rejection of some of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it shall be accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the 7th 8th 7th 8th 7th 8th 7th 7th 8th 8th 8th 7th "the plaintiff's "the plaintiff" was changed to "D" and "the witness Gap's testimony," written evidence Nos. 1, 2th 1 through 14, Eul, 16, 18, 19, and 21th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 5th 7th 12th 7th 7th 4th 7th 7th 7th 7th 8th 8th 14th 14th 14th 14th 14th 2013, changed to "the plaintiff's "the plaintiff" as "the defendant's title of this case was assigned to the defendant with the collection order No. 2013th 5th 2013.

Under 5, the following changes (as to this, the Plaintiff alleged that D did not make any other settlement as above, but the witness B of the first instance trial (B is the actual operator of D, and the seal imprint affixed on the evidence Nos. 16) were sent by D’s seal imprint.

In light of each of the above arguments, evidence Nos. 4-1 and witness B of the first instance court as shown in the above argument cannot be trusted as they are, and there is no counter-proof, and the above assertion is rejected.) - On six pages, the above argument shall be accepted.

arrow