logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.10 2014나5530
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, 6,733,471 won and 5% per annum from October 25, 2013 to February 10, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract for B dump truck (hereinafter “Plaintiff-motor vehicle”), and the Defendant (C) is the operator of the Defendant’s dump motorcycle (hereinafter “Defendant Oumba”).

B. On August 1, 2012, at around 14:35, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven the Defendant Yaba while driving the Defendant Yabab and driving the one-lane road in the vicinity of the boundary line (No. 359 local highways) at the port of Yabari at the port of the port of a spatha at the port of a police box at the port of a spatha at the port of a spatha at the port of the port of a spath (the spatha was installed only but the spatha was not operated at the above point of view; hereinafter referred to as

At the time, the driver’s vehicle was not driven by the Plaintiff at the front line of the stop line of the three-distance opposite to the three-distance opposite road at the time, despite that it was a situation in which the three-distance of this case was to pass directly from the area of the gold box to the area of the front line, the Defendant made a left-hand turn to the left-hand turn at the above crosswalk.

D finds the left-hand turn on the right-hand turn before passing through the three-distance stop line of this case, and immediately avoided the Plaintiff’s vehicle into the right-hand right-hand side, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle was returned to the right-hand side of the three-distance, and shocked the telegraph, large-sized signboards, light-based signboards, content supplementary signboards, traffic signs, signboards, etc. in the vicinity of the gurinals of the three-distance distance.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

Due to the instant accident, the said telegraph pole, large signboard, and paint were damaged, and D was injured. However, on August 28, 2012, the Plaintiff, as the insurer of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, was the insurer of the Plaintiff, 2,950,000 won at the repair cost of the said large signboard on September 21, 2012, as the repair cost of the said large signboard, 2,950,000 won, for the said large board, 363,270 won, and for the medical expenses of D on September 3, 2012, 1,363,270 won, and 5,650,000 won in total as the repair cost of the said large board, 14,963,270 won in total as the repair cost of the said large board.

arrow