logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.11.27 2019고단2002
사기방조등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On September 21, 2018, A was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court, and the judgment was finalized on November 5, 2018. On August 23, 2018, Defendant B was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution for six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Military Service Act from the Daejeon District Court’s astronomical Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 31, 2018.

1. In the name of the Defendants’ joint criminal conduct, the Defendants made phone calls to many unspecified domestic victims, misrepresented them to open a Maspbook, and made it possible for them to receive money from victims on the pretext of raising credit reputation in the process, and withdraw and divide it. Some of the above officers called call center to many unspecified domestic victims, and other officers, such as the Defendants, etc., take charge of the role of collecting and delivering the passbooks and debit cards to be used for committing the crime.

On April 16, 2018, an employee of the Singishing fraud team made a false statement to the effect that it is possible to grant a loan up to 50 million won at a low interest rate of government support funds if he/she assumes the victim C staff by misrepresenting the victim C staff at a non-place, and calls to the victim for a payment of the pre-existing loan amounting to 6 million won to E- Card of the victim, and pays the deposit document cost for six months and the deposit insurance cost for depositors.

However, in fact, as a member of the criminal organization for the purpose of phishing, there was no intention or ability to provide a loan even if he/she received the above money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the person under whose name the person under whose name the victim was accused of the victim as above, and thereby, 600,000 won from the G bank account in the name of F (H) around April 16, 2018, 550,000 won from the J account in the name of I (K) around 17:58 of the same day, and April 17, 2018.

arrow