The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who, around July 2013, borrowed KRW 50 million from C from around July 2013, created a collateral security right with a maximum amount of KRW 39 million and a maximum amount of KRW 26 million with respect to land and buildings owned D, the Defendant’s child-friendly owner of the land and buildings C.

Defendant paid KRW 20 million to Police Officers on October 2013, 2013, and offered the remainder of KRW 30 million as security.

E House demanded that “the cancellation of the registration of the establishment of the right to collateral security is different” from C to the effect that “the right to collateral security is not repaid.” It is rejected from C to the effect that “C shall divide the land into several parcels, 200 square meters and 30 million square meters, and shall create a right to collateral security on one parcel (the right to remain in use without any change).” A around that time, C and H (hereinafter “G land,” “H land”) displayed at the housing construction site at the same time, “A 300 square meters and 100 square meters and 300 square meters and 300 square meters and 300 square meters and 300 square meters and 100 square meters and 300 square meters and 300 square meters and 300 square meters and 100 square meters and 300 square meters and 200 square meters and 300 square meters and 300 square meters and 200 square meters and 300 square meters and 300 square meters.”

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from C, the Defendant was thought to register the creation of a right to collateral security (hereinafter “I land”) in the future with respect to the I land without value as a blind land (hereinafter “I land”), rather than the land on which the Housing Corporation was performing, which was shown to C, such as G land or H land, and there was no intention or ability to pay the interest promised to C, or to pay the principal.

The defendant.