Text
1. Defendant A’s instant public prosecution is dismissed.
2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for a year.
except that this judgment.
Reasons
Criminal History (Defendant B) Defendant and Victim A (25 years of age), and Victim C (28 years of age) are pro-friendly and live together with “E” on the first floor of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D underground.
1. Around August 15, 2019, at around 22:55, the Defendant suffered special injury to the victim C, the Defendant was assaulted by A from the “E” located on the fourth underground floor of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D 1st century, and the victim C (the age of 28) tried to go back to A, but the victim C gets the body of the Defendant in good hands and was in dangerous things to let the victim knife his/her hand, and caused injury to the victim, including a beer who was on the table of the table, for about six weeks of medical treatment.
2. The Defendant suffered special injury to the victim A, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) as stated in paragraph (1), brought the loss, etc. of C from beer’s disease, which is an dangerous object, as described in paragraph (1), and brought the victim’s face one time due to such beer’s disease, and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as cutting the bridge, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.
3. The special intimidation Defendant: (a) taken the victim’s face with beer disease as stated in paragraph (2) at the time and place; (b) took the victim’s face with beer disease; (c) took the victim’s hicker disease; and (d) took the victim’s hicker’s hicker’s hicker’s hicker; and (c) requested the victim to escape out of the damaged hicker’s hicker’s hicker’s hicker’s hicker’s hicker’s hicker’
Accordingly, the defendant carried a shoulderer disease, which is a dangerous object, and threatened the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. The victim C of each legal statement of the witness C, A, and A are relatively consistent with the developments leading up to the occurrence of the case from the investigative agency to this court, the situation at the time, and the defendant's behavior, and the consistency and existence of the above people's statements.