logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.07.17 2011가합5660
손해배상(기)등
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 20,650,50,00 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Plaintiff’s counterclaim from October 20, 201 to July 17, 2013.

Reasons

(a) is a person;

B. On July 21, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to be supplied with Broaching Machine machinery (hereinafter “instant machinery”) with a price of KRW 177,65 million (hereinafter “instant manufacturing contract”), and drafted a manufacturing contract with the following content (Evidence 3).

Although the Plaintiff’s contract for the manufacture of the KRACHINE states that the Plaintiff’s contract is “invoicing”, this appears to be a clear clerical error that represents the Plaintiff, so both of them are deemed to be both the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter referred to as “A” and “B” (hereinafter referred to as “B”) enter into a contract in order to produce BRACHING MACHINE as follows:

Article 1 (Contract Goods and Contract Price) “B” shall manufacture and supply equipment ordered by “A” on the following terms:

Until July 21, 2010, 176,50,00 VAT Map separately (including all machinery mainIN, OUT Convel), *2 copies * including 176,500,00 VT 194,150,000 and 3000,000, 30% of the fixed-term payment date and 52,950,000 (Advance 11,550,000:00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000.

arrow