1. The defendant shall indicate the attached drawings among the 607m2 and C 67m2 in Busan-gun, Busan-gun and the 67m2, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 13, 2017, Plaintiff, D, and E (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) had completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the land of 1,284 square meters (hereinafter “land of this case, including Plaintiff, etc.”) prior to Busan-gun, Busan-gun, Busan-gun, and cultivated Blus, etc. therein.

B. As the owner of each of the Defendant’s land in this case and the implementer of G urban development project (hereinafter “project in this case”), the Defendant, as part of the project in this case, is going to construct roads and build a landscape green belt adjacent to each of the Defendant’s land by way of cutting the ditches around each of the Defendant’s land, etc., and is currently implementing road construction works and green belt creation works on the roads.

C. Around November 2016, H refincing steel was opened in and around the vicinity of the instant land, including the Plaintiff, etc., and even before that, users of the instant land, including the Plaintiff, etc. used a map for construction works installed in I reply and J response, etc., or entered a road through a temporary connection passage installed in the K ditch section.

However, this is due to the opening of a lottery campaign file and the construction of a storage site in the instant project zone.

As of the closing date of the argument in this case due to the destruction or closure of both a temporary connecting passage for construction works as well as a temporary connecting passage, each of the Defendant’s land or L materials mountain (this court is a circumvented mountain road for on-site inspection; hereinafter “the instant mountain road”) was prohibited from entering the land, including the Plaintiff, etc., for contribution to the instant land.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, each entry or video of Gap evidence 2 through 9, the result of the on-site inspection by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the land, including the Plaintiff, etc., is blind on the road, and thus, the land including the Plaintiff, etc., including the Plaintiff, is indicated in the annexed drawing Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among each Defendant’s land.