A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 12, 2014, the Defendant issued a false statement to the victim, stating that “The facts are to create a hotel to the victim C as collateral, purchase a passenger car, and distribute it to the victim, and then did not have the intent or ability to reduce it to the victim.” However, on January 14, 2012, the Defendant received a loan from the E office operated by D with a view to obtaining a loan from a financial right as collateral and raising 300 million won to the necessary funds. The Defendant issued a false statement to the victim, stating that “The Defendant would obtain a loan under the name of F, which is run by the Party, and then sell it in cash immediately, and then make it possible for the victim to purchase it under the name of F, which is equivalent to KRW 642 million in the market price under the name of the said F, KRW 1,00,000, KRW 26,000 in the market price, and the Defendant did not receive a return to the victim for each of the facts constituting the offense, such as the fraud.”

When the defendant was accused of the above criminal facts and was sentenced to punishment in the first instance trial, the defendant had tried to raise a false complaint against C, who is a member of C and C, as fraud.

On February 2, 2015, the Defendant called the Daegu prison I in the name of the Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, Ssleep-ro 2624, which called the Defendant “Defendant Defendant D and C”, to dispose of the vehicle delivery money in the name of F and to repay the principal and interest of 10% by borrowing the vehicle delivery money in the name of F.” On February 2, 2012, the Defendant drafted a letter of complaint to the effect that “as the Defendant was punished by taking the money by taking the account in the name of the government branch of each two vehicles by taking the money transfer from the Defendant,” and that “the principal and interest of 10% shall be repaid by taking the vehicle delivery money out of the vehicle delivery money in the name of F.” In February 2, 2012, the Defendant made a letter of complaint to the effect that it was punished by taking the money transfer of 12.6 million won in the name of the government branch of each