beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant C, as well as each of the above amounts, from May 2, 2014 to May 2, 2014.
Reasons
1. From September 4, 2007 to August 13, 2009, the summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion in collusion with the Defendants, as indicated in the separate sheet, deceiving the Plaintiff as if the Defendants were to have value-free shares, and then sell them to the Plaintiff, and then, in which case they would receive money from the Plaintiff as the purchase price, or (2) would have to receive money from the Plaintiff without the mold if they were to have no intent or ability to repay, and by deceiving the Plaintiff, they acquired KRW 15.2 million in total by receiving money from the Plaintiff for the purpose of borrowing money.
Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff the above KRW 15.2 million and the damages for delay.
2. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments by Gap evidence Nos. 4 and 7: (i) by deceiving the plaintiff on August 13, 2009 that the defendant Eul would pay the money without the mold if he/she lends the money without the intention or ability to repay the money; (ii) by deceiving the plaintiff that he/she would make the payment without the mold if he/she lends the money without the intention or ability to repay the money on January 28, 2009; and (iii) by deceiving the plaintiff that he/she would receive KRW 10 million from the plaintiff, and by deceiving the plaintiff for the same purpose on August 13, 2009, he/she acquired KRW 12 million from the plaintiff and fraudulently acquired it by the plaintiff.
Furthermore, considering whether the Defendants either conspired with one another in acquiring the above money or acquired the money from the Plaintiff in excess of the above recognition scope, it is insufficient to recognize it only by the statement of the evidence Nos. 1 through 7, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Therefore, the plaintiff is liable to compensate for damages caused by tort. Defendant B is the day following the delivery date of the copy of the complaint of this case sought by the plaintiff for each of the above amounts. Defendant C is the 1 million won, Defendant C is the 11.2 million won, and each of the above amounts.