1. The defendant's appeal and the request for return of provisional payment are all dismissed.

2. Expenses for filing an appeal, and those for filing an application for the return of provisional payments.

1. On April 19, 2013, the Plaintiff was driving a BMM BMM vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff-related vehicle”) on April 19, 2013, and was driving the two-lanes above the two-lanes of the front side of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seocho-gu, the Plaintiff caused an accident of having contact with the Defendant bus No. 4146 (hereinafter “Defendant-related vehicle”) (hereinafter “instant accident”).

At the time, the part of the collision is the front right side of the plaintiff vehicle and the left side side of the defendant vehicle.

After that, the Plaintiff spent KRW 3,520,000 at the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, Eul evidence 3, Gap evidence 4, 5, and Eul evidence 1 and 2

2. The plaintiff asserts that the accident of this case occurred in the course of the defendant vehicle rapidly from the two-lane to the one-lane, and that the defendant should bear the full repair cost. Accordingly, the defendant argues that the accident of this case caused the accident of this case while changing the two-lane from the one-lane to the two-lane while neglecting the duty of the Jeonju City, and that the defendant cannot respond to the plaintiff's request on the ground that the vehicle of this case did not change the two-lane at the time.

3. 판단 이 법원의 폐쇄회로화면(CCTV) 영상물 검증결과에 의하면, 피고 차량은 우측 방향지시등을 켠 상태로 정차하여 있다가 출발하면서 인도에 바짝 붙어 진행한 사실, 그러던 중 피고 차량 운전자가 운전대를 약간 왼쪽으로 돌리면서 피고 차량과 인도 사이의 거리가 벌어졌고, 그 직후 이 사건 사고가 발생한 사실을 인정할 수 있는바, 위 인정사실에 의하면 피고 차량 운전자가 우회전하기 전 회전 반경을 확보하기 위하여 운전대를 왼쪽으로 조작하였고, 이 때 피고 차량이 차선을 밟거나 넘으면서 1차로에서 2차로 방향으로 약간 비스듬하게 진행하던 원고 차량과...