The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) is the fact that the defendant escaped while leaving the toilet when making a report to the police by the chief executive officer of the main office, and is not the victim;

In light of the fact that the defendant's statement has been repeatedly sent to the effect that the agreement would be reached, there is no credibility.

On the other hand, the victim consistently stated from the defendant that he committed an indecent act on the bucks, chests, and fucks, and prepared a self-written statement that explains and is supported by the situation of damage to H to the president of the main store immediately after the case. Employees G of the main store was able to hear the sound of the victim's care at the entrance of the room while Belgium was in the room, and the victim was able to hear the sound of the victim's care at the entrance of the room while Belgium was in the room, and the victim made a statement that the Belgium was out of Belgium while the Belgium was in a state where the Belgium was in a state where the bucket was in a state where the spuck was in a spuck in the front door, and H was in a staff room immediately after the case, there was sufficient evidence to reinforce the victim's statement. In light of the fact that the defendant also made it possible for the other party to feel sexual humiliation or aversion without permission, the charges of this case are fully found guilty.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances, the lower court rendered a judgment not guilty of the Defendant on the ground that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the facts charged and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① A victim’s statement at the investigative agency and the court below’s court below as shown in the facts charged are difficult to believe it as it is or insufficient to recognize the facts charged for the following reasons.

The victims of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the victim only stated as the "the defendant forced to reduce the victim's s