logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.02.11 2014고정1029
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On August 26, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car at around 10:20, and proceeded bypassing the road in front of the E Licensed Real Estate Agent D located in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gu, from the multi-school level to the multi-school level from the multi-school level.

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to protect pedestrians by checking whether a person engaged in driving service has a way to reduce speed and by checking well the right and the right and the right of the road, and driving safely in accordance with the new subparagraph.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the defendant neglected this and proceeded to the stop signal as it is, the defendant got the victim F (the age of 81) who dried the crosswalk from the right side of the defendant's running on the left side of the road to the left side of the road in accordance with the pedestrian signals of pedestrians, and caused the victim to go beyond the road.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury to the upper part of the upper part of the pelpelle which requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of G;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. An accident site photograph;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to investigation report, investigation report (a medical certificate attached), investigation report (a signal system analysis) [a fact of violation of the signal of the defendant according to the evidence is recognized, and the vehicle of the defendant was almost obstructed and stopped, and the victim who tried to cross the crosswalk is trying to damage the vehicle of the defendant while driving the crosswalk again, and it is reasonable to view that the case falls under the case where the pedestrian driving the crosswalk is shocked.]

1. Article 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts;

arrow