beta
Text
The Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000. If the Defendants fail to pay the said fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants lent the name of loans to Q and R, which were engaged in automobile installment financing brokerage business, to Q and R. However, the Defendants failed to repay loans that Q and R received from the loan company, thereby receiving demand for payment instead of the Defendants.
Around December 10, 2013, the Defendants filed a complaint against the lending company by asserting that they created a broadband name “S” in the name of “S” on the Internet portal website and had known the fact that the loan was made, and that Q and R exercised it by presenting the said application to the lending company as if it was a document duly formed. In order to prove this, the Defendants stated the personal information of the complainants in the application for a non-use vehicle loan as used cars (the Defendants of this case) and stated the personal information of the complainants in the application for the non-use vehicle loan as used cars (the Defendants of this case) and affixed the seal impression of the complainants after stating the loan, etc., and forged the application for non-use loan in the name of the complainants, and presented it to the lending company as if
However, Q and R notified the Defendants of the fact that they were receiving installment financing loans used in a used vehicle, and prepared an application for installment loans by delegation of the authority to apply for installment loans, and the Defendants received from the employees of the lending company confirmation calls from the employees of the lending company about whether they were making loans, the name of the purchased used vehicle, the number of installment months, the interest rate, and the existence of the acquisition of the automobiles, and thus, the Defendants knew that the loans are made by vehicle installments.
Nevertheless, on December 26, 2013, the Defendants submitted the above written complaint to the employees in the civil service center of the Chuncheon District Public Prosecutor's Office on December 26, 2013.
As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion with Qu and R.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against Defendants, Q Q and R.