1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "A witness G of the first instance court of Grade 1 ", as shown in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the 3rd to 13th and the part in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the 3rd to 16th, each in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the 5th to 17th, each in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the part in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement in the statement.

Dried parts 1

G. Some of the Plaintiff’s goods kept in the instant work room were currently lost (hereinafter “instant accident”), and some of the remainder of art works and furnitures, etc. are kept in another heading room of the instant building (attached Form No. 29).

[Based on recognition, the plaintiff asserted that Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 8, and 20, testimony or video of the first instance court witness G, the result of the on-site inspection by this court, and the whole purport of this court), and the plaintiff's assertion that the work office of this case has no entire storage of 11 points produced by the plaintiff, and therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay 28 million won, including the above art value of 11 million won and 17 million won, (see the plaintiff's grounds of appeal Nos. 3 and 4)'s grounds of appeal Nos. 7 and 8, the video of the first instance court, the witness G of this case, and the witness testimony of this case.