1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

(b) in respect of its commitments, as follows:

- - The following - will make every effort to avoid damage to the neighborhood in carrying out the above project, and if the damage occurs, it will be restored to the original state on the responsibility of the operator and in accordance with the direction of the licensing authority. - If the construction of a building in the tourist resort development zone is completed after the completion of the project or before the completion of the project, it will be immediately relocated, remove and restore the existing temporary building to its original state, and in the case of non-performance, it will be free of objection in the compulsory disposition of the

On July 3, 2008, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for occupancy or use permission of public waters, and prepared and submitted each of the following contents (hereinafter “each of the instant notes”).

The period of permission: The purpose of permission from August 8, 2008 to August 7, 2010 (two years): the installation PE double wall (400): 884m Audio angle (100*100*4.2T): the conditions of permission 1,045.0m

1. Since this building is subject to the building permit under Article 11 of the Building Act, the starting time for the construction after the building permit has been completed.

2. The period of permission shall be temporarily used before the project in this case is completed;

3. Upon completion of the project in this case, relocation must be made to its original state (hereinafter referred to as removal of the building).

C. On August 8, 2008, the Defendant: (a) granted the Plaintiff occupation and use permission with respect to F Branch line Franchison (public waters) 630 square meters (hereinafter “instant public waters”); (b) as follows.

On August 14, 2008, the Plaintiff filed a report on the construction of a temporary building for the purpose of detached houses, which uses the public waters of this case as the site for a building. However, on August 19, 2008, the Defendant filed the said report on the construction of a temporary building on the ground that “a building for the purpose of detached houses is not subject to the report on the construction of a temporary building under Article 20 of the Building Act, but is subject to the construction permission under Article 11 of the Building