The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of suspended sentence (6 months of imprisonment for a suspended period) imposed by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. We examine the judgment. Each of the crimes of this case committed while under the influence of alcohol by the defendant, obstructing the performance of official duties by assaulting the police officer while under the influence of alcohol, obstructing the suspect interrogation, and forging the signature of another person by entering his name, and thus, the quality of the crime cannot be deemed to be negligible. However, the defendant's mistake is against his own wrongness and again, the defendant has no specific criminal record other than the record of receiving juvenile protective disposition due to his age and special larceny, the defendant's deposit of some amount for police officers at the court below, and taking full account of various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and other sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and consequence of the crime. Thus, the prosecutor's allegation above is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.