Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the above defendant does not pay the fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the head of the association of G apartment reconstruction and maintenance project association (hereinafter referred to as the "association") from July 2013.

around October 30, 2014, at the general meeting of partners, H appraiser and I appraiser corporation (hereinafter “existing appraisal corporation”) were selected as appraisal business operators of the association, and around May 2015, the association conducted an appraisal by the existing appraisal corporation, including the estimated value of all assets of its members, from the existing appraisal corporation.

On the other hand, in order to raise the appraised value of the existing appraisal corporation with respect to the commercial buildings in the business area, Defendant B shall select another appraisal corporation and undergo an additional appraisal, and reflect it in the rearrangement project of the association. On April 28, 2016, the appraisal of the previous assets (former commercial buildings) for the formulation of a management and disposal plan between A and A, a meeting of the members of the above association who were members of the commercial building in the business area and are the representative of the "Commercial Reconstruction Committee", a meeting of the members of the commercial building in the business area, shall be selected on an average of the values appraised by two appraisal business entities selected by the president of the association and the appraisal business entity selected by the chairman

“A letter related to the reconstruction of commercial buildings,” the content of which is “,” etc.

Defendant

B entered into a contract for appraisal and assessment with the J Appraisal Corporation and K Appraisal Corporation recommended by A in accordance with the above agreement at the ordinary and French land in May 2016.

In this regard, although the selection of appraisal business entity of the association is subject to the resolution of the general meeting, Defendant B did not undergo it.

As a result, Defendant B arbitrarily selected an appraisal business entity of a union without a resolution of the general meeting.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Statement made by the prosecutor with respect to L;

1. Statement made by the police against M;

1. Each accuser and accuser's written opinion;

1. Application of investigation report (to listen to telephone statements, such as L, etc. which is K Appraisal Corporation);

1. Criminal facts;