logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.11.07 2019누36447
호봉정정신청 거부처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the trial while filing an appeal for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the plaintiff's claim even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the court of first instance are

Therefore, the reasoning for this Court regarding this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition or dismissal as follows. Thus, this Court shall accept it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

After the 7th sentence of the first instance judgment, "(7) 17th sentence" means "(16) 1 and 2 of the Public Officials Remuneration Regulations [Attachment Table 16] on the career conversion rate of public officials in general service, etc.: (1) 1 and 2 shall be converted into all or part of their career experience in the case of public officials, regardless of whether they are engaged in the same field of duties in the case of public officials ( subparagraph 1), and (2) the career experience of public officials in the agencies of the State, local governments, etc.

A) In the case of “a person who has worked in the same field as that of a public official or a person who has worked in a private company, etc.” (Article 2(b) and (c) provides that a person who has worked in the same field as that of a public official or a person who has worked in the same field as that of a public official shall be converted within the scope of 100% as a specialized special career (Article 2(a) and subparagraph 2(a) provides that a person who has worked in the private company shall be discriminated against a person who has worked in

However, the career recognition system is introduced to attract excellent human resources with expertise as public officials and to rationalize the treatment of public officials with different career experience at the same time, and it is defined in the salary grade of public officials.

arrow