A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 6. 8. 경 서울 강서구 C 101호 피고인이 운영하던 ‘D’ 사무실에서, 피해자 에스케이 네트 웍스 주식회사와 시가 약 2,099만 원 상당의 E 아반 떼 승용차 및 시가 약 2,336만 원 상당의 F 스포 티지 승용차를 임차하는 장기 대여 계약을 체결하고, 피해 자로부터 위 승용차들을 인도 받아 피해자를 위하여 보관하고 있었다.

While the Defendant kept the said car owned by the victim as above, on August 2016, the Defendant embezzled the said car by arbitrarily transferring the said car to a person without the victim’s consent and transfer procedure (hereinafter “G”).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. The reason for sentencing (the scope of recommending punishment) of Article 355(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 355(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts is [the scope of recommending punishment] of Article 355(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 355(1) of the Criminal Act [the grounds for sentencing [the scope of recommending punishment] of the basic area (from April to January 14) [the person who has no special sentencing [the person who has no damage] [the decision of sentencing] of the victim

However, the sentencing conditions stated in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's confession of the crime of this case and the mistake is divided, the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, means and result of the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered by considering all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case.