logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.12.06 2013노1011
명예훼손등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal in collusion with E to indicate false facts as stated in the facts charged in the instant case, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim H, as well as causing E and I to obtain criminal punishment, and filed a false petition with the investigative agency for the purpose of having E and I receive criminal punishment, and there is sufficient evidence to support this.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant not guilty on the ground that there is no proof of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant was the former representative director of the D Association, a non-governmental organization, which is a non-governmental organization with the purpose of creating a Korean national Rose on the main master’s office and on the road side of the D Association; and (b) E was a former director of

On June 18, 2012, the above Association opened the third general meeting at G cafeteria located in the former North Korean F, and held voting for the election of the next representative director, and elected the victim H as the representative director.

E around June 22, 2012, at the office of the Association, the victim was appointed as the representative director of the Association at the time of the first establishment of the Association, and HC managed public funds that had been paid KRW 00,000 per person from its members at the time of the establishment of the Association. However, according to the horses at the time, the members were saved with KRW 0,000,000,000, and part of the members were paid back to the executives and employees of the Association, because they did not pay public funds to the executives and employees of the Association, and even until now paid the subscription fees, HC did not pay. The election of the disqualifications by some mothers cannot be legally recognized, and thus, it would be null and void.” As to the above notice, the Defendant’s notice was given.

arrow