The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion was made by the introduction of C around April 2009 by the plaintiff, and the defendant was asked to lend money to the plaintiff for the reason that he was working as a system household construction work, and that he did not work as a system household construction work, and the plaintiff borrowed 46,62,847 won to the defendant by using his name Samsung Card, new card, lot card, one card, and our card, or by using cash service.

Therefore, the Plaintiff seek against the Defendant the payment of the above loan amounting to KRW 46,662,847 and the delay damages.

2. Although there is no dispute between the parties to the judgment, or according to the statements in the Evidence Nos. 1 and 6, the Plaintiff’s Samsung Card’s name from February 2010 to July 2010, the Plaintiff’s new card under the Plaintiff’s name was 7,660,30 won, from around March 2010 to August 201, 16,109,427 won, and the Plaintiff’s new card under the Plaintiff’s name was 10,48,390 won from around June 2010 to November 2010, the Plaintiff’s one card under the Plaintiff’s name was used from around 6, 2010 to around July 2010 to around 9, 2010, and there was no other evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff’s new card was 10,448,390 won, or one of the Plaintiff’s respective cash cards were used from around 10, 2010.

3. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.