A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-A-hurd motor vehicle.

On September 5, 2017, the Defendant driven the lurged car around 07:15, and went to the right turn to the left at the intersection in order to turn to the right turn to the right turn, while driving the lurged road before the E store located in D in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, from the long-distance lurbing plane to the right side of the opposite line while driving the lurged car.

The written indictment states that “the defendant was snicked to proceed to a opposite line.” However, according to the evidence of this case, the defendant is deemed to have been in the process of moving to a path in the opposite line and making a left turn to the right at the intersection. Thus, it is recognized as such.

In such cases, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the motor vehicle on the front side and to safely operate the motor vehicle along the lanes, and to make a left turn while driving the motor vehicle along the lanes of the crime.

In the written indictment, since there is a center line of yellow solid lines at the time, there was a duty of care to make a internship at the point where the internship is permitted.

“The” described to the effect that it is, but for the same reasons as Section 1, it is recognized as such.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to see the G bargaining car driven by the victim F(55) of the Mingju, and made a left turn to the left at the intersection at the three-lanes of the right-hand lane, rather than the left-hand turn, and the written indictment stated that “the Defendant was negligent by snicking the center line at the third-lane, and by snicking it at the center,” but on the same ground as that of each week 1).

In order to avoid the defendant's vehicle, the victim F was forced to get the victim F to get the back part of the H bus owned by Han-gu corporation, one stock company, which was stopped on two-lanes for consultation on the validity of the same road as the front part of the driver's vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant above.