The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who served as a vice-military force from March 201 to December 201, 201.

At a frequency where the name of E is unknown around December 2, 2011, the Defendant: “The victim F is the head of the Gun with the inside of the Do, and he is promoting H museum business in D Gun with the donation of 200 points from G, and the D Gun and D Gun Council consented to it, and the site is also secured.

If you purchase 10 million won per point of 10 million won of Chinese Chinese Chinese Chinese own Dogs now held, you would purchase 100 million won per point of 40 million won in D Dogs for six months, and then I would like to make a false statement to the effect that Doggr's own 100 million won per point of 1,000 won because Dogr's own 10 billion won per point of 1,000 won.

However, at the time, the D Gun Council opposed to the establishment of H museum for budgetary reasons, ordered the D Gun I to carefully examine the establishment of the H museum, and the D Gun I failed to secure the site for the museum, so it was very uncertain in the D Gun, and there was no plan for the establishment of the H museum in the D Gun, and there was no plan for the above Dogrgrgrgrgrgies in the D Gun. The 10th Dogrgrgrgrgs sold by the Defendant to the victim did not own value of KRW 30 million per 1,00,000,000 per China's fake as well as 650.

Nevertheless, on December 13, 201, the Defendant received a total of KRW 270,000,000 from the victims of the false statement, and acquired a transfer of KRW 30,000,000,000 from the said Agricultural Cooperative Account via two occasions on March 13, 2012, from the victims of the false statement.

2. Determination

A. The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial must be borne by the prosecutor, and the conviction should be based on the evidence of probative value that makes the judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt.