logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.06.17 2015나616
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid additionally shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On April 22, 2011, Nonparty C is the Category D car (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) at around D around April 22, 201.

(ii) A driver of the vehicle driving service has started from four lanes in front of the Friju station in the Seogu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E, and proceeds from about 20km in speed to the Sungwest Industrial Complex. (ii) In this case, C is not obliged to change course when it is likely to obstruct normal traffic of other vehicles running on the lane intended to change, and C is obliged to change course in advance, give prior notice of change in course and give notice of change in traffic conditions, and to prevent accidents by safely changing the lane. However, C has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely changing the lane, while neglecting this duty of care, while changing the lane from four lanes to one lane.

In accordance with the same direction one-lane, the accident of collisioning the wheels part of the instant vehicle that is driven by G with the left side of the front side of the instant vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”) and caused the Plaintiff, who was on the front side of the right side of the instant vehicle, by interfering with the course of t 100 otoba (hereinafter “the instant accident”) in a speed of about 60 km a speed of 14 km a speed of speed, and caused the Plaintiff, who was on the front side of the instant vehicle, to suffer from the injury of the instant accident, such as an abrush, which requires medical treatment for 14 weeks.

3) At the time of the instant accident, G (15 years of age) and H (15 years of age), as well as the Plaintiff (14 years of age), who is the driver of the instant accident, were on board the said passenger. However, G, the Plaintiff, and H cut off the instant Orab, and did not wear protective equipment, such as safety caps, at the time, while driving and getting on the said passenger. (4) The Defendant, as an insurer that entered into the instant comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with C, paid KRW 15,046,160 to the Plaintiff as the medical fee, and C paid KRW 20,000 to the Plaintiff as the criminal agreement after the instant accident.

arrow