A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2016, around 14:00, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the case, i.e., injury No. 4001 high-ranking court No. 2015 high-ranking court No. 4001 high-ranking court No. 3, 2015.

During the hearing of the above case, the defendant "It is essential that the witness stated that the defendant B was holding to the defendant C the Macju World."

The prosecutor’s question, “I am below,” need to be examined.

Otherwise, it is required to go alone.

At the same time, there is a need to do anything more than 20 minutes, at the same time.

Long term required.

Now, since her flings, so far as he/she can do so, he/she may become a member of the Republic of Korea, and there is a way to do so.

It has been neglected outside so far.

The C was seated with the same way as it was.

B. The testimony was made to the effect that B was not deemed to have been holding a beer World Cup to C, such as a reply to “I am alone and have come to the outside soften, whether or not he was sitting outside the scam.”

However, in fact, the defendant observed B to C that he was crypted.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect in preparation of a public prosecutor against the defendant or B;

1. A criminal investigation report (a copy of the record suspected of perjury, confirmation of the progress of the criminal trial between C and B, and submission of a suspect A submitted);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal records and investigation records;

1. Article 152 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 153 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to be mitigated by law;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: (a) the Defendant, who recognized the criminal facts of this case from an investigative agency, reflects his mistake; and (b) the economic situation as a recipient of a basic living security appears to have not been followed by the last half-year decision for the settlement of disputes; and (c) etc., are favorable to the Defendant.