logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2021.02.09 2017가단31717
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Defendants: 11.19/1060 shares of 11.19/10660 shares among the 100,660 square meters from the Plaintiff in Seocho-si P. 10,660 square meters, respectively.

Reasons

1. The facts of recognition and determination are that the Plaintiff constructed an aggregate building (hereinafter “the instant condominium”) composed of 9 Dong-dong and 803 households on the land indicated in the order (hereinafter “instant land”). However, the Plaintiff did not register the transfer of ownership of the instant land, which is the site, only before the ownership of the instant condominiums was completed. After the Plaintiff’s cadastral adjustment, the Plaintiff was possible to register the transfer of ownership of the instant land only after the ownership was completed. The network R completed the registration of ownership of 1/10 shares among the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 (S among the instant condominiums) on the fourth-story Q No. 1989 on November 29, 199 on the ground that the ownership transfer was completed on March 9, 201, R was deceased on March 9, 201, and the ownership transfer of the instant condominiums became final and conclusive on March 16, 2010 on the ground that it could not be recognized as the heir’s share transfer between the heir and the heir’s share transfer.

According to the above facts, the defendants, the final co-inheritors of the network R, are obligated to take over the registration procedure for ownership transfer on November 29, 1990, with respect to the share of 11.119/10060 of the land in this case to be reverted to the network R among the land in this case, with the share of 1.19/1060 corresponding to each of the shares in the attached list 1/14 (the defendant N does not accept the claim in this case since there is no evidence to support that he was tried to waive inheritance). 2. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim will be cited for the reason that it is reasonable. However, with respect to the apportionment of litigation costs, the defendant will bear the burden by applying Articles 98 and 99 of the Civil Procedure Act.

arrow