The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (a punishment of one year and six months, evidence 1 to 3, 10, 11) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is favorable to the defendant that the defendant led to the confession of and reflects on the crime of this case, that the defendant has no particular criminal records except for the punishment of a fine once due to drinking driving, and that the defendant supports the minor children of a woman of matrimonial engagement with a woman of matrimonial engagement.

However, the crime of this case was committed by opening an illegal Internet gambling site and acquiring property gains. Such illegal Internet gambling is highly harmful to society, such as encouraging the people to commit an excessive speculative spirit and failure in home economy, etc. The defendant led the crime of this case. The defendant received money exceeding 600 million won in total from 3,915 times after attracting about 290 members while operating two illegal sports gambling sites for six months. The defendant was sentenced to money exceeding 3,915 times. The punishment imposed by the court below corresponds to the lowest punishment specified in the sentencing guidelines set by the Supreme Court sentencing Committee, and other circumstances, such as the defendant's character, character, age, family relationship, motive, circumstance, means and consequence of the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing appearing in the records, are not deemed unfair since the sentence imposed by the court below is too excessive.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, since it is obvious that it is a clerical error, it shall be corrected to add the crime sight tickets such as the annexed Form to the original judgment).